/explore
|
You are here 
|
pedestrianobservations.com | ||
| | | | |
marketurbanism.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion revolves around the economic and social implications of transportation systems, particularly focusing on the differences between private and public ownership. Key points include the historical context of subway and elevated rail systems in New York City, the debate over their effectiveness in urban development, and the role of user fees versus subsidies in funding transportation infrastructure. There is also a mention of the importance of public control over transportation to ensure equitable service and prevent the exclusion of underserved communities. The conversation touches on the broader implications of transportation policy, including its impact on urban sprawl, pollution, and the economy. | |
| | | | |
freakonomics.com
|
|
| | | | | Amtrak's ridership and revenue has been steadily increasing over the last 10 years, and 2011 set a new ridership record with 30.2 million passengers, and $1.9 billion in ticket revenue. But, even though it took in $1.42 billion from Congress last year, it still manages to lose $1 billion annually. This is hardly a new development. Amtrak has a long and storied history of functioning at a loss despite government subsidies.So, as we enter what appears to be a new era (maybe?) of government austerity, it se... | |
| | | | |
www.etany.org
|
|
| | | | | With billions at stake, greater NY must now make a decision: will we lock in outdated service paradigms, or will we build the 21st-c. rail network the region needs? | |
| | | | |
seattletransitblog.com
|
|
| | | This post is the second in a series, adapted from an article I wrote for my blog, Transportation Matters, a Pacific Northwest-flavored blog that discusses railway planning, urban planning, and rela... | ||
