/explore
|
You are here 
|
pedestrianobservations.com | ||
| | | | |
marketurbanism.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion revolves around the economic and social implications of transportation systems, particularly focusing on the differences between private and public ownership. Key points include the historical context of subway and elevated rail systems in New York City, the debate over their effectiveness in urban development, and the role of user fees versus subsidies in funding transportation infrastructure. There is also a mention of the importance of public control over transportation to ensure equitable service and prevent the exclusion of underserved communities. The conversation touches on the broader implications of transportation policy, including its impact on urban sprawl, pollution, and the economy. | |
| | | | |
www.thetransportpolitic.com
|
|
| | | | | ยป Metropolitan Seattle plans to offer its voters the chance to fund a large new transit expansion program. But are the projects chosen for initial funding the right ones? Building a regional fixed-... | |
| | | | |
freakonomics.com
|
|
| | | | | Amtrak's ridership and revenue has been steadily increasing over the last 10 years, and 2011 set a new ridership record with 30.2 million passengers, and $1.9 billion in ticket revenue. But, even though it took in $1.42 billion from Congress last year, it still manages to lose $1 billion annually. This is hardly a new development. Amtrak has a long and storied history of functioning at a loss despite government subsidies.So, as we enter what appears to be a new era (maybe?) of government austerity, it se... | |
| | | | |
cal.streetsblog.org
|
|
| | | The Newsom administration wants to cut the ATP because Caltrans is tired of having its state highway funding tapped. | ||
