Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.etany.org | ||
| | | | |
seattletransitblog.com
|
|
| | | | | The Ballard and SLU light rail segment is expected to get up to 57,000 riders. That's higher than any of the other Link projects planned for ST3 (Everett, Tacoma Dome, West Seattle, or Issaqu... | |
| | | | |
pedestrianobservations.com
|
|
| | | | | The Regional Plan Association ran an event 2.5 days ago about New York commuter rail improvements and Penn Station, defending the $16.7 billion Penn Station Expansion proposal as necessary for capacity. The presentation is available online, mirrored here, and I recommend people look at the slides to understand the depth of the ignorance and incuriosity... | |
| | | | |
ashtonkemerling.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The provided text is a detailed, multi-faceted discussion on high-speed rail (HSR) and its viability as an alternative to air travel, particularly focusing on the California High-Speed Rail (CA HSR) project. Key points include: 1. **HSR vs. Air Travel**: The author argues that HSR can be a competitive alternative to air travel, especially for shorter distances. They challenge the notion that HSR is unachievable with current technology and funding, citing examples like Japan's Shinkansen and China's high-speed rail networks. The text questions the feasibility of a 2-hour and 40-minute travel time between San Francisco and Los Angeles, suggesting that even a 2-hour and 48-minute trip could be competitive with air travel when considering airport s... | |
| | | | |
marketurbanism.com
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The discussion revolves around the economic and social implications of transportation systems, particularly focusing on the differences between private and public ownership. Key points include the historical context of subway and elevated rail systems in New York City, the debate over their effectiveness in urban development, and the role of user fees versus subsidies in funding transportation infrastructure. There is also a mention of the importance of public control over transportation to ensure equitable service and prevent the exclusion of underserved communities. The conversation touches on the broader implications of transportation policy, including its impact on urban sprawl, pollution, and the economy. | ||
