Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.jeremykun.com | ||
| | | | |
stephenmalina.com
|
|
| | | | | Selected Exercises # 5.A # 12. Define $ T \in \mathcal L(\mathcal P_4(\mathbf{R})) $ by $$ (Tp)(x) = xp'(x) $$ for all $ x \in \mathbf{R} $. Find all eigenvalues and eigenvectors of $ T $. Observe that, if $ p = a_0 + a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + a_3 x^3 + a_4 x^4 $, then $$ x p'(x) = a_1 x + 2 a_2 x^2 + 3 a_3 x^3 + 4 a_4 x^4. | |
| | | | |
jiggerwit.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | In the texbook I'm using for a first course in algebraic geometry, the proof of Bezout's theorem is awful. Looking around, I find an abundance of awful proofs. A good proof is one that I would want to commit to memory. Here is a good proof of Bezout's theorem, which is due to Gurjar and... | |
| | | | |
nhigham.com
|
|
| | | | | The Cayley-Hamilton Theorem says that a square matrix $LATEX A$ satisfies its characteristic equation, that is $latex p(A) = 0$ where $latex p(t) = \det(tI-A)$ is the characteristic polynomial. This statement is not simply the substitution ``$latex p(A) = \det(A - A) = 0$'', which is not valid since $latex t$ must remain a scalar... | |
| | | | |
4uinews.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | ?? ????? ???? ?? ??????? ???? ?? ???? ???? ?? ????? ?? ????? ????? ?? ????? ???? 1978 ??? ?????? ?? ?? ?? ??? ??? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ???????? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ???? ?? ?????? ?? ?? ???? ??? ?? ???? ??? ?? ????? ??? ??? ?? ???????????? ?? ?? ??? ???... | ||
