/explore
|
You are here 
|
scienceofdoom.com | ||
| | | | |
tallbloke.wordpress.com
A while ago I posted a tongue in cheek thread about the old Keihl and Trenberth Earth energy budget diagram and the new shiny all colour one NASA now has on their website. Here they are again for comparison: The major difference between these diagrams is the 'surface radiation' from the surface to the atmosphere... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
by Judith Curry The calculation of atmospheric radiative fluxes is central to any argument related to the atmospheric greenhouse/Tyndall gas effect. Atmospheric radiative transfer models rank among the most robust components of climate model, in terms of having a rigorous ... Continue reading |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
rclutz.com
It is often said we must rely on projections from computer simulations of earth's climate since we have no other earth on which to experiment. That is not actually true since we have observations upon a number of planetary objects in our solar system that also have atmospheres. This is brought home by a paper,... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.americanthinker.com
When a Nobel Prize-winning physicist, Dr John Clauser, labels the claims about greenhouse gases warming the Earth as "pseudoscience" and describes them as "a dangerous corruption of science," I urge you to take notice. He furt... |
|
| | | |||
