Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
tallbloke.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
scienceofdoom.com
|
|
| | | | | InNew Theory Proves AGW Wrong! I said: So, ifNew Theory Proves AGW Wrong is an exciting subject, you will continue to enjoy the subject for many years, because I'm sure there will be many more papers from physicists "proving" the theory wrong. However, it's likely that if they are papers "falsifying" the foundational "greenhouse" gas... | |
| | | | |
wattsupwiththat.com
|
|
| | | | | Here are 22 good reasons not to believe the statements made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guest essay by Jean-Pierre Bardinet. According to the official statements of the IPCC "Science is clear" and non-believers cannot be trusted. Quick action is needed! For more than 30 years we have been told that we... | |
| | | | |
breadonthewater.co.za
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The provided text is a discussion thread on climate change and the greenhouse effect, featuring various perspectives and arguments. The key points include debates over the role of CO2 in global warming, the mechanisms of the greenhouse effect, and the validity of climate models. Some contributors argue that CO2 does not significantly contribute to warming, while others support the mainstream scientific consensus. The discussion includes references to empirical data, such as temperature records from specific locations, and critiques of climate policy and scientific institutions. The tone varies between scientific analysis and skepticism, with some participants challenging the IPCC's conclusions and others defending the greenhouse effect as a fund... | |
| | | | |
climateofsophistry.com
|
|
| | | I think that it is better to use a spherical Earth with the real solar input to do an energy budget, rather than a flat Earth with 1/4 the solar input like peer-reviewed and pedagogical climate science does things. It makes a difference, because with 1/4 solar input of S(1-a)/4, this equates to a solar... | ||
