Outer Web | Explore

Explore >> Select a destination

You are here		tallbloke.wordpress.com Whatever happened to back radiation? part II \| Tallbloke's Talkshop
\|	\|	judithcurry.com Confidence in radiative transfer models - Climate Etc.	6.2 parsecs away Travel
\|	\|	by Judith Curry The calculation of atmospheric radiative fluxes is central to any argument related to the atmospheric greenhouse/Tyndall gas effect. Atmospheric radiative transfer models rank among the most robust components of climate model, in terms of having a rigorous ... Continue reading ?	6.2 parsecs away Travel
\|	\|	scienceofdoom.com Theory and Experiment - Atmospheric Radiation \| The Science of Doom	6.2 parsecs away Travel
\|	\|	InNew Theory Proves AGW Wrong! I said: So, ifNew Theory Proves AGW Wrong is an exciting subject, you will continue to enjoy the subject for many years, because I'm sure there will be many more papers from physicists "proving" the theory wrong. However, it's likely that if they are papers "falsifying" the foundational "greenhouse" gas...	6.2 parsecs away Travel
\|	\|	ourchangingclimate.wordpress.com Open thread \| My view on climate change	10.2 parsecs away Travel
\|	\|	Feel free to discuss any climate related matters that are not a core topic of another post. If you somehow claim that climate sciencehas it allwrong, please be so kind to first check out the list here: There's a good chance that your argument is listed there, with a clear and referenced reply. Keep it...	10.2 parsecs away Travel
\|	\|	scienceofdoom.com Heat Transfer Basics - Part Zero \| The Science of Doom	57.6 parsecs away Travel
\|		This post "follows" on from Heat Transfer Basics and Non-RadiativeAtmospheres and Do Trenberth and Kiehl understand the First Law ofThermodynamics? and many other posts that cover some basics. It's clear from comments on this blog and many other blogs that a lot of people have difficulty understanding simple scenarios because of a lack of understanding...	57.6 parsecs away Travel