|
You are here |
jennifermarohasy.com | ||
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
|
|
| | | | | by Judith Curry The calculation of atmospheric radiative fluxes is central to any argument related to the atmospheric greenhouse/Tyndall gas effect. Atmospheric radiative transfer models rank among the most robust components of climate model, in terms of having a rigorous ... Continue reading | |
| | | | |
tallbloke.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | A while ago I posted a tongue in cheek thread about the old Keihl and Trenberth Earth energy budget diagram and the new shiny all colour one NASA now has on their website. Here they are again for comparison: The major difference between these diagrams is the 'surface radiation' from the surface to the atmosphere... | |
| | | | |
scienceofdoom.com
|
|
| | | | | On a couple of unrelated articles on this blog, people have been asking questions about the moon. This is because a lot of people have read an articlecalled A Greenhouse Effect on the Moon from www.ilovemycarbondioxide.com that makes some confused claims. The article starts: We've been told that the earth's surface is quite a bit... | |
| | | | |
breadonthewater.co.za
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The article presents a skeptical analysis of the greenhouse effect and global warming claims, using Stefan-Boltzmann law calculations and lunar temperature comparisons to argue that human-induced CO2 contributes minimally to climate change, while noting that the reference category 'modelling' was not available in the provided list. | ||