Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
rclutz.com | ||
| | | | |
scienceofdoom.com
|
|
| | | | | In the first post about CO2 I included a separate maths section which showed the energy budget for the earth and also derived how much energy we receive from the sun. A comment today reminded me that I should do a separate article about this topic. I've seen lots of comments on other blogs where... | |
| | | | |
chriscolose.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | The blog Watts up with That is famous for its attempt to reinvent climate physics on Earth, and now they want to reinvent astrophysics as well. Steve Goddard, a frequent poster at WUWT, now has a couple of posts (here and here) as well as write ups by Lubos Motl, about how the extreme temperatures... | |
| | | | |
climateofsophistry.com
|
|
| | | | | I think that it is better to use a spherical Earth with the real solar input to do an energy budget, rather than a flat Earth with 1/4 the solar input like peer-reviewed and pedagogical climate science does things. It makes a difference, because with 1/4 solar input of S(1-a)/4, this equates to a solar... | |
| | | | |
theglobal.blog
|
|
| | | By Urs Luterbacher - Why leading by example sometimes does not pay, and why a return to the principles of the Kyoto Protocol is necessary. | ||
