/explore
|
You are here 
|
judithcurry.com | ||
| | | | |
rclutz.com
It is often said we must rely on projections from computer simulations of earth's climate since we have no other earth on which to experiment. That is not actually true since we have observations upon a number of planetary objects in our solar system that also have atmospheres. This is brought home by a paper,... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
scienceofdoom.com
InNew Theory Proves AGW Wrong! I said: So, ifNew Theory Proves AGW Wrong is an exciting subject, you will continue to enjoy the subject for many years, because I'm sure there will be many more papers from physicists "proving" the theory wrong. However, it's likely that if they are papers "falsifying" the foundational "greenhouse" gas... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
christophepocharienergietechnik.com
Arrhenius's Demon: The Chimera of the Greenhouse effect Arrhenius's Demon: The Chimera of the Greenhouse effect Posted on January 6, 2023 by Christophe Pochari Introduction Note: The radiative heat transfer equation based on Stefan-Boltzmann 4th power law is erroneous and cannot be relied upon. The only way to possibly measure radiative heat transfer is by... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
wattsupwiththat.com
Here are 22 good reasons not to believe the statements made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guest essay by Jean-Pierre Bardinet. According to the official statements of the IPCC "Science is clear" and non-believers cannot be trusted. Quick action is needed! For more than 30 years we have been told that we... |
|
| | | |||
