Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
christophepocharienergietechnik.com | ||
| | | | |
climateofsophistry.com
|
|
| | | | | I think that it is better to use a spherical Earth with the real solar input to do an energy budget, rather than a flat Earth with 1/4 the solar input like peer-reviewed and pedagogical climate science does things. It makes a difference, because with 1/4 solar input of S(1-a)/4, this equates to a solar... | |
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
|
|
| | | | | by Judith Curry With over 1000 comments on Saturday's greenhouse thread, here is a new thread devoted to technical discussions of Joseph Postma's paper on the greenhouse effectand Chris Colose's rebuttal at Skeptical Science. A primer on solar insolation is excerpted from text Thermodynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, link [thermo txt]. | |
| | | | |
www.drroyspencer.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion revolves around the greenhouse effect and its role in global warming, with conflicting views on the magnitude of warming, the energy balance, and the role of solar activity. Key points include debates over the actual warming effect of greenhouse gases (GHGs), the energy imbalance, and the attribution of recent warming to natural causes versus human-induced factors. There are also mentions of solar activity, satellite data, and the role of the oceans in heat storage. The conversation includes references to scientific studies, models, and data sources such as the AIRS satellite and Schuckmann et al. 2023, highlighting the complexity and ongoing nature of climate science discussions. | |
| | | | |
wattsupwiththat.com
|
|
| | | Guest post by Bob Tisdale This is a deviation from my typical presentation of a subdivided dataset. Usually, I divide the dataset in a way that is intended to illustrate how and why natural variables can explain the warming over the term of that data. In this post, I've broken it into subsections that allow... | ||
