Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
ncatlab.org | ||
| | | | |
almostsuremath.com
|
|
| | | | | The aim of this post is to motivate the idea of representing probability spaces as states on a commutative algebra. We will consider how this abstract construction relates directly to classical probabilities. In the standard axiomatization of probability theory, due to Kolmogorov, the central construct is a probability space $latex {(\Omega,\mathcal F,{\mathbb P})}&fg=000000$. This consists... | |
| | | | |
www.jeremykun.com
|
|
| | | | | Last time we investigated the (very unintuitive) concept of a topological space as a set of "points" endowed with a description of which subsets are open. Now in order to actually arrive at a discussion of interesting and useful topological spaces, we need to be able to take simple topological spaces and build them up into more complex ones. This will take the form of subspaces and quotients, and through these we will make rigorous the notion of "gluing" and "building" spaces. | |
| | | | |
qchu.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | In this post we'll describe the representation theory of theadditive group scheme$latex \mathbb{G}_a$ over a field $latex k$. The answer turns out to depend dramatically on whether or not $latex k$ has characteristic zero. Preliminaries over an arbitrary ring (All rings and algebras are commutative unless otherwise stated.) The additive group scheme $latex \mathbb{G}_a$ over... | |
| | | | |
fankhauserblog.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | Here are photos from my travel experiences: Istanbul to Rome, Macedonia Trip | ||
