Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
almostsuremath.com | ||
| | | | |
mkatkov.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | For probability space $latex (\Omega, \mathcal{F}, \mathbb{P})$ with $latex A \in \mathcal{F}$ the indicator random variable $latex {\bf 1}_A : \Omega \rightarrow \mathbb{R} = \left\{ \begin{array}{cc} 1, & \omega \in A \\ 0, & \omega \notin A \end{array} \right.$ Than expected value of the indicator variable is the probability of the event $latex \omega \in... | |
| | | | |
xorshammer.com
|
|
| | | | | Nonstandard Analysis is usually used to introduce infinitesimals into the real numbers in an attempt to make arguments in analysis more intuitive. The idea is that you construct a superset $latex \mathbb{R}^*$ which contains the reals and also some infinitesimals, prove that some statement holds of $latex \mathbb{R}^*$, and then use a general "transfer principle"... | |
| | | | |
qchu.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | In this post we'll describe the representation theory of theadditive group scheme$latex \mathbb{G}_a$ over a field $latex k$. The answer turns out to depend dramatically on whether or not $latex k$ has characteristic zero. Preliminaries over an arbitrary ring (All rings and algebras are commutative unless otherwise stated.) The additive group scheme $latex \mathbb{G}_a$ over... | |
| | | | |
profmattstrassler.com
|
|
| | | Matt Strassler [April 12, 2012] It is common that, when reading about the universe or about particle physics, one will come across a phrase that somehow refers to ``matter and energy'', as though they are opposites, or partners, or two sides of a coin, or the two classes out of which everything is made. This | ||
