|
You are here |
almostsuremath.com | ||
| | | | |
qchu.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | As a warm-up to the subject of this blog post, consider the problem of how to classify$latex n \times m$ matrices $latex M \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times m}$ up to change of basis in both the source ($latex \mathbb{R}^m$) and the target ($latex \mathbb{R}^n$). In other words, the problem is todescribe the equivalence classes of the... | |
| | | | |
jmanton.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | If $latex Y$ is a $latex \sigma(X)$-measurable random variable then there exists a Borel-measurable function $latex f \colon \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ such that $latex Y = f(X)$. The standard proof of this fact leaves several questions unanswered. This note explains what goes wrong when attempting a "direct" proof. It also explains how the standard proof... | |
| | | | |
djalil.chafai.net
|
|
| | | | | The logarithmic potential is a classical object of potential theory intimately connected with the two dimensional Laplacian. It appears also in free probability theory via the free entropy, and in partial differential equations e.g. Patlak-Keller-Segel models. This post concerns only it usage for the spectra of non Hermitian random matrices. Let \( {\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{C})} \) be the set of probability measures... | |
| | | | |
earlycomics.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | Six early strips by F. M. Howarth, who later developed a more individual style with for instance the Sunday strip 'Lulu and Leander'. I rearranged some of them vertial, for ease of online viewing. The last one has the topical theme. See also: http://yesterdayspapersarchive.blogspot.com/2008/03/self-portrait-of-franklin-morris.html | ||