Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
fabricebaudoin.blog | ||
| | | | |
djalil.chafai.net
|
|
| | | | | This post is mainly devoted to a probabilistic proof of a famous theorem due to Schoenberg on radial positive definite functions. Let us begin with a general notion: we say that \( {K:\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathbb{R}^d\rightarrow\mathbb{R}} \) is a positive definite kernel when \[ \forall n\geq1, \forall x_1,\ldots,x_n\in\mathbb{R}^d, \forall c\in\mathbb{C}^n, \quad\sum_{i=1}^n\sum_{j=1}^nc_iK(x_i,x_j)\bar{c}_j\geq0. \] When \( {K} \) is symmetric, i.e. \( {K(x,y)=K(y,x)} \) for... | |
| | | | |
almostsuremath.com
|
|
| | | | | The martingale property is strong enough to ensure that, under relatively weak conditions, we are guaranteed convergence of the processes as time goes to infinity. In a previous post, I used Doob's upcrossing inequality to show that, with probability one, discrete-time martingales will converge at infinity under the extra condition of $latex {L^1}&fg=000000$-boundedness. Here, I... | |
| | | | |
algorithmsoup.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | The ``probabilistic method'' is the art of applying probabilistic thinking to non-probabilistic problems. Applications of the probabilistic method often feel like magic. Here is my favorite example: Theorem (Erdös, 1965). Call a set $latex {X}&fg=000000$ sum-free if for all $latex {a, b \in X}&fg=000000$, we have $latex {a + b \not\in X}&fg=000000$. For any finite... | |
| | | | |
bluebirdofbitterness.com
|
|
| | | Reblogged on WordPress.com | ||
