Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
openaccessbelgium.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
ferniglab.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | The so-called "sting" by Science on Open Access journals has brought a lot of criticism, some of this is here, and here. For me the best has been Micheal Eisen's post, which uses satire to show that Science was well wide of the mark. As the discussion dies down on the subject, I have had... | |
| | | | |
journals.plos.org
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] This page details the post-acceptance workflow for authors submitting to PLOS journals, including steps for editorial and formal acceptance, final checks, peer review history publication, author proof review, and press release guidelines. | |
| | | | |
ubublog.sites.uu.nl
|
|
| | | | | Yesterday, Science Magazine scooped with a story on a sting with fake articles that passed peer review of 157 Open Access journals. In the article | |
| | | | |
spiralprogress.com
|
|
| | | From his post: 2. The true nature of reality is so strange, I'm not sure "God" or "theism" is well-defined, at least as can be discussed by human beings. That fact should not lead you to militant atheism (I also can't define subatomic particles), but still it pushes me toward an "I don't believe" attitude... | ||
