Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
chorasimilarity.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
svpow.com
|
|
| | | | | An extraordinary study has come to light today, showing just how shoddy peer-review standards are at some journals. Evidently fascinated by Science's eagerness to publish the fatally flawed Arsenic Life paper, John Bohannon conceived the idea of constructing a study so incredibly flawed that it didn't even include a control. His plan was to see... | |
| | | | |
curt-rice.com
|
|
| | | | | The "sting" operation published in Science Magazine claims to highlight corruption in the open access model, but it's actually about problems with peer review - even if Scie... | |
| | | | |
pubchase.com
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
osc.universityofcalifornia.edu
|
|
| | | "What's the difference between ResearchGate, Academia.edu, and the institutional repository?" "I put my papers in ResearchGate, is that enough for the open access policy? These and similar questions have been been common at open access events over the past couple of years. Authors want to better understand the differences between these platforms and when they should use one, the other, or some combination. First, a brief primer on what each service has to offer: ResearchGate and Academia.edu ResearchGate and Academia.edu are social networking platforms whose primary aim is to connect researchers with common interests. Users create profiles on these services, [...] | ||
