/explore
|
You are here 
|
buildingblogsofscience.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
michaelschoon.com
|
|
| | | | | Recently an article in Science surveyed open access journals and found a number of distressing findings with respect to the peer review process. An overview is available at:http://www.scidev.net/global/publishing/news/sting-exposes-wild-west-of-open-access-publishing.html?utm_content=bufferb2a6d&utm_source=buffer&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Buffer The original version in Science is at:http://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full As the Science article acknowledges, the same results could be found if we did a survey of traditional journals as... | |
| | | | |
curt-rice.com
|
|
| | | | | The "sting" operation published in Science Magazine claims to highlight corruption in the open access model, but it's actually about problems with peer review - even if Scie... | |
| | | | |
ferniglab.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | The so-called "sting" by Science on Open Access journals has brought a lot of criticism, some of this is here, and here. For me the best has been Micheal Eisen's post, which uses satire to show that Science was well wide of the mark. As the discussion dies down on the subject, I have had... | |
| | | | |
www.ensafh.nl
|
|
| | | |||
