Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
buildingblogsofscience.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
curt-rice.com
|
|
| | | | | The "sting" operation published in Science Magazine claims to highlight corruption in the open access model, but it's actually about problems with peer review - even if Scie... | |
| | | | |
ferniglab.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | The so-called "sting" by Science on Open Access journals has brought a lot of criticism, some of this is here, and here. For me the best has been Micheal Eisen's post, which uses satire to show that Science was well wide of the mark. As the discussion dies down on the subject, I have had... | |
| | | | |
journals.plos.org
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
critical-switch.org
|
|
| | | This article is based on a talk we did at the Hackmeeting at Zaragoza in september 2025. You can download the slides here. Objectives The objectives of this article are: Help articulate a critical theoretical framework that can serve as a base for social movements: we perceive that there is a widespread loss of historical memory and a lack of deep understanding of the origin of our current problems, especially what ideologies have brought us here. We want to fight the hopelessness that there is no horizon beyond capitalism with a critical discourse that helps us feel that we can have control over the narrative of our reality. Unify critical perspectives against technocapitalism: we want to connect the different perspectives and analyses that have already bee... | ||
