|
You are here |
www.johnmyleswhite.com | ||
| | | | |
www.jeremykun.com
|
|
| | | | | For fixed integers $ r > 0$, and odd $ g$, a Moore graph is an $ r$-regular graph of girth $ g$ which has the minimum number of vertices $ n$ among all such graphs with the same regularity and girth. (Recall, A the girth of a graph is the length of its shortest cycle, and it's regular if all its vertices have the same degree) Problem (Hoffman-Singleton): Find a useful constraint on the relationship between $ n$ and $ r$ for Moore graphs of girth $ 5$ and degree $ r$. | |
| | | | |
aperiodical.com
|
|
| | | | | If you see me doing a maths thing, I'm probably wearing one of my maths t-shirts. I've got quite a few, but the one that reliably produces the much-sought-after look of total indifferen... | |
| | | | |
stephenmalina.com
|
|
| | | | | Matrix Potpourri # As part of reviewing Linear Algebra for my Machine Learning class, I've noticed there's a bunch of matrix terminology that I didn't encounter during my proof-based self-study of LA from Linear Algebra Done Right. This post is mostly intended to consolidate my own understanding and to act as a reference to future me, but if it also helps others in a similar position, that's even better! | |
| | | | |
almostsuremath.com
|
|
| | | The martingale property is strong enough to ensure that, under relatively weak conditions, we are guaranteed convergence of the processes as time goes to infinity. In a previous post, I used Doob's upcrossing inequality to show that, with probability one, discrete-time martingales will converge at infinity under the extra condition of $latex {L^1}&fg=000000$-boundedness. Here, I... | ||