/explore
|
You are here |
amylhowe.com | ||
| | | | |
www.scotusblog.com
The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that public officials who post about topics relating to their work on their personal social media accounts are acting on behalf of the government, [...] |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.techdirt.com
After several years of litigation across the federal appellate courts, the U.S. Supreme Court in a unanimous opinion has finallycrafted a testthat lower courts can use to determine whether a government official engaged in "state action" such that censoring individuals on the official's social media page-even if also used for personal purposes-would violate the First... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.eff.org
In a unanimous opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court has finally crafted a test that lower courts can use to determine whether a government official engaged in "state action" such that censoring individuals on the official's social media page-even if also used for personal purposes-would violate the First Amendment. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
jilliancyork.com
[AI summary] The author discusses exchanging Signal contact information for networking purposes and reflects on their long-term use of the app for trusted messaging. |
|
| | | |||