|
You are here |
www.techdirt.com | ||
| | | | |
clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu
|
|
| | | | | Within a month, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.,[1] a case that (i) could radically change the potential for bankruptcy to serve as the preferred mechanism for corporations seeking to resolve mass torts, (ii) could significantly diminish the rights of mass tort vic... | |
| | | | |
www.scotusblog.com
|
|
| | | | | The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that public officials who post about topics relating to their work on their personal social media accounts are acting on behalf of the government, [...] | |
| | | | |
www.eff.org
|
|
| | | | | In a unanimous opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court has finally crafted a test that lower courts can use to determine whether a government official engaged in "state action" such that censoring individuals on the official's social media page-even if also used for personal purposes-would violate the First Amendment. | |
| | | | |
archive.strongtowns.org
|
|
| | | Even people who know the historic benefits of duplexes (and the like) can be wary of re-legalizing them. We need to understand why if we want to effectively promote missing middle housing. | ||