Explore >> Select a destination

You are here

 www.eff.org
U.S. Supreme Court Does Not Go Far Enough in Determining When Government Officials Are Barred from Censoring Critics on Social Media | Electronic Frontier Foundation
| | amylhowe.com
Public officials can be held liable for blocking critics on social media
1.2 parsecs away

Travel
| | The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that public officials who post about topics relating to their work on their personal social media accounts are acting on behalf of the government, and therefore can be held liable for violating the First Amendment when they block their critics, only when they have the power to speak on... Read More
| | prismreports.org
The Supreme Court has given Project 2025 a way to dictate policy
2.7 parsecs away

Travel
| | I was on a train to New York City when the Supreme Court overturned 40 years of legal precedent that was the backbone of our civil infrastructure, advancing a lot of Project 2025's anti-democratic plans to eliminate the "deep state" and control the personal lives of the American people.
| | www.thefire.org
Freedom of assembly and why it's important | The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression
2.5 parsecs away

Travel
| | The Supreme Court ruled in 1937 that "the holding of meetings for peaceable political action cannot be proscribed."
| | turnto10.com
Shutdown 'proved' the Department of Education is not needed, McMahon says
11.8 parsecs away

Travel
| White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt holds news briefing