|
You are here |
vridar.org | ||
| | | | |
www.leaderu.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The article presents a comprehensive historical and theological examination of the resurrection of Jesus, arguing that it is a central event in Christian belief and history. It critiques alternative explanations for the resurrection, such as mythological borrowing, hallucinations, and theft of the body, and asserts that these theories are insufficient to explain the emergence and growth of Christianity. The author emphasizes the uniqueness of Jesus and the transformative impact of the resurrection on the early Christian community, including the radical transformation of figures like James, Peter, and Paul. The article also highlights the historical attestation of the resurrection through early Christian writings and external sources like Tacitus... | |
| | | | |
isthatinthebible.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Note: This article is based on updated research and is intended to replace my old article on Melchizedek, written several years ago. It has also been produced as a documentary at the MythVision YouTube channel. Melchizedek. You've probably heard that name before, but many Christians would be hard-pressed to tell you who he was or... | |
| | | | |
historyforatheists.com
|
|
| | | | | The idea that the historical Jesus was a Jewish apocalyptic prophet remains the most likely interpretation of the evidence about who and what he was. | |
| | | | |
andyjohnson.uk
|
|
| | | |||