|
You are here |
www.leaderu.com | ||
| | | | |
bibleinterp.arizona.edu
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The text explores the diverse beliefs about death and the afterlife in ancient Near Eastern cultures, particularly focusing on Jewish and early Christian traditions during the Second Temple Period. It highlights how various communities addressed theodicy, the problem of evil, by proposing that the righteous would be rewarded and the wicked punished in the afterlife. The discussion includes different views on resurrection, immortality, and eternal life, with references to key texts like the Apocrypha, Pseudepigrapha, and the New Testament. The text also notes the influence of Greek philosophy on Jewish thought, as seen in figures like Philo of Alexandria, and how these ideas shaped early Christian doctrines, particularly the belief in Jesus' resu... | |
| | | | |
historyforatheists.com
|
|
| | | | | The idea that the historical Jesus was a Jewish apocalyptic prophet remains the most likely interpretation of the evidence about who and what he was. | |
| | | | |
isthatinthebible.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Speaking in tonguesis one of the strangest behaviours that is regularly practiced in modern Christianity. Is it the initial evidence of a believer's salvation? A futile charade? A demonic manifestation? A tool for missionary work? All these views and more can be found in the official and unofficial doctrines taught by various churches. For better... | |
| | | | |
historyforatheists.blogspot.it
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The article refutes the 'Flat Earth Myth' by demonstrating that medieval scholars in Western Europe universally understood the Earth as spherical. It highlights that knowledge of the Earth's sphericity was widespread and even common among the unlearned, supported by evidence from vernacular literature, iconography, and historical texts. The piece critiques the spread of this myth by figures like Neil deGrasse Tyson and New Atheists, who perpetuate historical inaccuracies. The author emphasizes the importance of accurate historical understanding and criticizes the uncritical acceptance of pseudo-historical narratives. | ||