/explore
|
You are here 
|
nhigham.com | ||
| | | | |
g-w1.github.io
|
|
| | | | | A proof about roses? Who would have thought! | |
| | | | |
www.jeremykun.com
|
|
| | | | | This proof assumes knowledge of complex analysis, specifically the notions of analytic functions and Liouville's Theorem (which we will state below). The fundamental theorem of algebra has quite a few number of proofs (enough to fill a book!). In fact, it seems a new tool in mathematics can prove its worth by being able to prove the fundamental theorem in a different way. This series of proofs of the fundamental theorem also highlights how in mathematics there are many many ways to prove a single theorem... | |
| | | | |
mattbaker.blog
|
|
| | | | | In my previous post, I presented a proof of the existence portion of the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a PID based on the Smith Normal Form of a matrix. In this post, I'd like to explain how the uniqueness portion of that theorem is actually a special case of a more general... | |
| | | | |
www.3blue1brown.com
|
|
| | | What is the Riemann zeta function? What is analytic continuation? This video lays out the complex analysis needed to answer these questions. | ||
