/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.dorfonlaw.org | ||
| | | | |
www.law.cornell.edu
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The text presents a legal analysis of the constitutionality of the independent counsel statute, focusing on the separation of powers and executive authority. The Supreme Court examines whether the statute's provisions, particularly the 'good cause' removal standard and the special court's appointment authority, violate the President's constitutional duty to ensure the faithful execution of the laws. The Court considers precedents such as *Humphrey's Executor* and *Wiener* to determine whether the independent counsel, an inferior officer, is subject to removal restrictions that impede the President's executive power. The analysis concludes that the statute does not unduly interfere with the President's constitutional obligations, as the 'good cau... | |
| | | | |
www.chrisritchie.org
|
|
| | | | | A few interesting op-eds in the aftermath of Trump v Anderson. | |
| | | | |
supreme.justia.com
|
|
| | | | | Bush v. Gore: Despite violating the Fourteenth Amendment by using disparate vote-counting procedures in different counties, Florida did not need to complete a recount in the 2000 presidential election because it could not be accomplished in a constitutionally valid way within the time limit set by federal law for resolving these controversies. | |
| | | | |
archive.firstladies.org
|
|
| | | With the great media attention focused on Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has also come numerous media requests for thoughts on his w | ||
