Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
supreme.justia.com | ||
| | | | |
www.law.cornell.edu
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The text discusses the legal and historical context surrounding campaign finance regulations, particularly focusing on the regulation of corporate and union political speech. It highlights key Supreme Court cases such as Buckley v. Valeo, Citizens United v. FEC, and McConnell v. FEC, which have shaped the understanding of corporate expenditures in elections. The text emphasizes the distinction between direct contributions and independent expenditures, the role of PACs, and the rationale behind restrictions on corporate spending to prevent corruption and the appearance thereof. It also references the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), noting how they have been upheld by the Court as legitimate exer... | |
| | | | |
www.dorfonlaw.org
|
|
| | | | | by Michael C. Dorf The Supreme Court decided two cases today that involve the relation between the federal government and American Indian ... | |
| | | | |
www.theatlantic.com
|
|
| | | | | An oral history of the craziest presidential election in modern history | |
| | | | |
www.jurist.org
|
|
| | | The US Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on May 15 regarding the federal government's request to implement President Donald Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship-the constitutiona... | ||
