Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.law.cornell.edu | ||
| | | | |
ukhumanrightsblog.com
|
|
| | | | | By guest contributor Saira Turner In U3 (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] UKSC 19, the Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed an appeal against a decision taken by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission ("SIAC") relating to deprivation of citizenship and refusal of entry clearance on the basis of national security concerns. [...] | |
| | | | |
fee.org
|
|
| | | | | Jefferson believed that government was the greatest threat to individual liberty. | |
| | | | |
supreme.justia.com
|
|
| | | | | Humphrey's Executor v. United States | |
| | | | |
www.whitecase.com
|
|
| | | Previous Chapter | Next Chapter | Index of Chapters Why does this topic matter to organisations? Processing of personal data is lawful only if, and to the extent that, it is permitted under EU data protection law. If the controller does not have a legal basis for a given data processing activity (and no exemption or derogation applies) then that activity is prima facie unlawful. | ||
