/explore
|
You are here |
www.lesswrong.com | ||
| | | | |
unstableontology.com
(note: one may find the embedded LaTeX more readable on LessWrong) The Löwenheim-Skolem theorem implies, among other things, that any first-order theory whose symbols are countable, and which has an infinite model, has a countably infinite model. This means that, in attempting to refer to uncountably infinite structures (such as in set theory), one "may... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
blog.sigfpe.com
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
pavpanchekha.com
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
xorshammer.com
We think of a proof as being non-constructive if it proves "There exists an $latex x$ such that $latex P(x)$ without ever actually exhibiting such an $latex x$. If you want to form a system of mathematics where all proofs are constructive, one thing you can do is remove the principle of proof by contradiction:... |
|
| | | |||