/explore
|
You are here |
relatedwork.blogspot.com | ||
| | | | |
gowers.wordpress.com
It's been a while since I have written a post in the "somewhat philosophical" category, which is where I put questions like "How can one statement be stronger than an another, equivalent, statement?" This post is about a question that I've intended for a long time to sort out in my mind but have found... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
existentialtype.wordpress.com
It is well-known that constructivists renounce "proof by contradiction", and that classicists scoff at the critique. "Those constructivists," the criticismgoes, "want to rule out proofs by contradiction. How absurd! Look, Pythagoras showed that the square root of two is irrational by deriving a contradiction from the assumption that it is rational. There is nothing wrong... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
adam.chlipala.net
[AI summary] This text provides an in-depth exploration of advanced Coq proof techniques, focusing on manual proofs, recursion, and induction principles for complex data structures. It covers topics like nested inductive types, custom induction principles, and the design philosophy behind Coq's approach to proof automation. The text includes detailed examples of proof scripts, such as manual proofs for discrimination and injectivity of constructors, and discusses the use of tactics like discriminate and injection. It also touches on the implementation of functions like pred and the role of hints in improving proof readability and automation. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
kristalcantwell.wordpress.com
Mini-polymath 4 has started. It is based on question 3 of the IMO. The research thread is here. There is a wiki here. |
|
| | | |||