|
You are here |
fharrell.com | ||
| | | | |
hbiostat.org
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
hbiostat.org
|
|
| | | | | This article presents an argument that for RCTs with a binary outcome the primary result should be a distribution and not any single number summary. The GUSTO-I study is used to exemplify risk difference distributions. | |
| | | | |
www.rdatagen.net
|
|
| | | | | I've been curious to see how helpful ChatGPT can be for implementing relatively complicated models in R. About two years ago, I described a model for estimating a treatment effect in a cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial. We used a generalized additive model (GAM) with site-specific splines to account for general time trends, implemented using the mgcv package. I've been interested in exploring a Bayesian version of this model, but hadn't found the time to try - until I happened to pose this simple question to ChatGPT: | |
| | | | |
philstatwars.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | General Schedule PDF CLICK ON READINGS Topic: Current Controversies in Phil Stat (LSE, Remote 15:00 - 17:00; Thursdays 21 May-18 June) Main Text SIST:Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Statistics WarsCUP, 2018)*: Slides for each meeting will be on individual meeting posts on this blog. I. (May 21) Introduction: Controversies in... | ||