|
You are here |
pavpanchekha.com | ||
| | | | |
blog.computationalcomplexity.org
|
|
| | | | | In my post about the myth that Logicians are crazy I mentioned in passing that Whitehead and Russell spend 300 pages proving 1+1=2 (but we... | |
| | | | |
www.twanvl.nl
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
azdavis.net
|
|
| | | | | Various varieties of function in programming languages. | |
| | | | |
xorshammer.com
|
|
| | | Let $latex \mathrm{PA}$ be Peano Arithmetic. Gödel's Second Incompleteness Theorem says that no consistent theory $latex T$ extending $latex \mathrm{PA}$ can prove its own consistency. (I'll write $latex \mathrm{Con}(T)$ for the statement asserting $latex T$'s consistency; more on this later.) In particular, $latex \mathrm{PA} + \mathrm{Con}(\mathrm{PA})$ is stronger than $latex \mathrm{PA}$. But certainly, given that... | ||