Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
scienceofdoom.com | ||
| | | | |
climateofsophistry.com
|
|
| | | | | I think that it is better to use a spherical Earth with the real solar input to do an energy budget, rather than a flat Earth with 1/4 the solar input like peer-reviewed and pedagogical climate science does things. It makes a difference, because with 1/4 solar input of S(1-a)/4, this equates to a solar... | |
| | | | |
andthentheresphysics.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Before I go out I wanted to briefly mention a recent paper by Patrick Brown and Ken Caldeira called [g]reater future global warming inferred from Earth's recent energy budget. Patrick Brown already has a nice blog post about this with a couple of really informative videos. I encourage you to read Patrick's post and watch... | |
| | | | |
tallbloke.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | A while ago I posted a tongue in cheek thread about the old Keihl and Trenberth Earth energy budget diagram and the new shiny all colour one NASA now has on their website. Here they are again for comparison: The major difference between these diagrams is the 'surface radiation' from the surface to the atmosphere... | |
| | | | |
www.davidappell.com
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The history of climate change research shows that scientists have long recognized the potential impact of human activities on the climate. From the early 20th century, there were discussions about the greenhouse effect and its influence on global temperatures. Over time, as more data became available, the consensus among scientists grew that increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide, are a significant factor in global warming. Key milestones include the 1958 discovery of the Keeling Curve, which demonstrated the steady rise in atmospheric CO2 levels, and the 1970s and 1980s when the scientific community began to more clearly understand the implications of these changes. By the late 20th century, the evidence supp... | ||
