/explore
|
You are here 
|
grossack.site | ||
| | | | |
almostsuremath.com
|
|
| | | | | Continuing on from the previous post, I look at cases where the abstract concept of states on algebras correspond to classical probability measures. Up until now, we have considered commutative real algebras but, before going further, it will help to look instead at algebras over the complex numbers $latex {{\mathbb C}}&fg=000000$. In the commutative case,... | |
| | | | |
www.math3ma.com
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.jeremykun.com
|
|
| | | | | The First Isomorphism Theorem The meat of our last primer was a proof that quotient groups are well-defined. One important result that helps us compute groups is a very easy consequence of this well-definition. Recall that if $ G,H$ are groups and $ \varphi: G \to H$ is a group homomorphism, then the image of $ \varphi$ is a subgroup of $ H$. Also the kernel of $ \varphi$ is the normal subgroup of $ G$ consisting of the elements which are mapped to the identity under $ \varphi$. | |
| | | | |
alanrendall.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | The theorem of the title is about dividing smooth functions by other smooth functions or, in other words, representing a given smooth function in terms of products of other smooth functions. A large part of the account which follows is based on that in the book 'Normal Forms and Unfoldings for Local Dynamical Systems' by... | ||
