Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
tcpaworld.com | ||
| | | | |
cipaworld.com
|
|
| | | | | CIPA problems are continuing to bubble up for an online retailer. In Rodriguez v. Aquatic Sales Solutions, LLC 2024 WL 2804097 (C.D. Cal. May 29, 2024), the Plaintiff claimed that she visited the Defendant's aquarium supplies website and the chat feature on the site was eavesdropped by Zendesk. Defendant allegedly "allowed Zendesk to 'embed...code into... | |
| | | | |
cipaworld.com
|
|
| | | | | We found an interesting California Invasion of Privacy Act case coming out of the Western District of Washington. In Heinz v. Amazon.com, Inc., 2024 WL 2091108 (W.D. Wash., May 8, 2024), Plaintiff, like presumably most Americans, made some purchases on Amazon.com. While doing so, he was shown language that stated "by placing your order, you... | |
| | | | |
cipaworld.com
|
|
| | | | | The Gap was recently hit with a class action, Carbajal v. The Gap, Inc., in the District Court of Arizona for its alleged use of "spy tracking pixels" in marketing emails sent to Plaintiffs who subscribed to The Gap's email list. The Baroness recently reported about the new wave of Arizona privacy litigation involving tracking... | |
| | | | |
cipaworld.com
|
|
| | | At CIPAWorld, we talk a lot about the use of CIPA against web recording or web analytics companies. Even though historically CIPA was designed to prevent wiretapping over the phone. But, we have a case today that is a good old-fashioned "wiretapping" case. Kinda. In Gladstone v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 2024 WL 3276490 (W.D.... | ||
