Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
natlawreview.com | ||
| | | | |
www.law360.com
|
|
| | | | | A U.S. Supreme Court decision in favor of the plaintiff in Gonzalez v. Google - to cleave algorithmic curation from Section 230 - would jeopardize the functionality of the modern web, be harmful for consumers and also be legally misguided, says Jess Miers at Chamber of Progress. | |
| | | | |
www.law360.co.uk
|
|
| | | | | A U.S. Supreme Court decision in favor of the plaintiff in Gonzalez v. Google - to cleave algorithmic curation from Section 230 - would jeopardize the functionality of the modern web, be harmful for consumers and also be legally misguided, says Jess Miers at Chamber of Progress. | |
| | | | |
www.whitecase.com
|
|
| | | | | White & Case Tech Newsflash In this short three-minute video, Washington, DC-based partner F. Paul Pittman discusses the implications of the proposed new SEC rules on cybersecurity governance and what corporate boards can do now. Filmed at the Digital Directors Network (DDN) Domino 2023 conference on digital and cybersecurity governance. | |
| | | | |
corporateeurope.org
|
|
| | | The EU Ombudsman has found that it was "maladministration" when the EU Commission did not disclose the full impact assessment and associated Regulatory Scrutiny Board opinion on the upcoming REACH revision. | ||
