Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.ministryoftruth.me.uk | ||
| | | | |
www.translegalproject.org
|
|
| | | | | Download this article here:IntroductionThis articlecritically discusses the judgmentin For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16. I have tried where possible for itbe accessible to non-lawyers and to lawyers of all specialisms. The articleis not intended to be comprehensive in its critique of the judgment but focuseson three points:1. The implications of the Court declining to considerunder section 3(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998whether its interpretation would breach t | |
| | | | |
www.legalfeminist.org.uk
|
|
| | | | | The decision of the High Court in Bell v & anor v The Tavistock & Portman NHS Foundation Trust & ors [2020] EWHC 3274 (Admin) has given rise to both jubilation and outrage. Detransitioners and their gender critical allies feel vindicated by judicial recognition that treatment of children with puberty blockers is experimental and dangerous; | |
| | | | |
ukconstitutionallaw.org
|
|
| | | | | In For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers the UK Supreme Court rejected the contention that possession of a Gender Recognition Certificate changes an individual's sex for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010, maintaining equality of status for all those protected under the characteristic of gender reassignment and ensuring that biological women are protected... | |
| | | | |
publiclawforeveryone.com
|
|
| | | I have just finished work on abook chapter entitled "The Principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty in Legal, Constitutional and Political Perspective", the abstract for which is as follows: Parliamentary sovereignty has long been regarded - by most, at least - as an axiomatic feature of the United Kingdom's constitutional arrangements. The orthodox view holds that the... | ||
