/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.translegalproject.org | ||
| | | | |
www.legalfeminist.org.uk
The decision in A v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 21, [2005] 1 AC 51 has been the subject of much recent analysis by those involved, and those interested, in the hearing before the Supreme Court in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers. The Scottish Ministers (Respondent) and Amnesty International (intervening) have relied |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
ukconstitutionallaw.org
Crash Wigley: For Women Scotland: A Case of Significant Silences - UK Constitutional Law Association For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16 is a judgment that has triggered great public discussion about the position of trans people in Great Britain (for an interesting discussion of the legal position in Northern Ireland, see Deb et al, "Limits to the UK Supreme Court's Reach: Northern Ireland, the Windsor Framework and... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
ukhumanrightsblog.com
The Weekly Round Up: 'Sex' defined by Supreme Court, Trump administration contempt proceedings, and clinicians' right to privacy |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
citizen-network.org
Gavin Barker on the issues of democratic accountability and the protections we should build into our welfare system. |
|
| | | |||
