/explore

Click through on any links that interest you or select the planets on the right to continue exploring the Outer Web.
You are here

 www.translegalproject.org
For Women Scotland: a legal critique
| | www.bailii.org
For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16 (16 April 2025)
1.1 parsecs away

Travel
| |
| | ukconstitutionallaw.org
Crash Wigley: For Women Scotland: A Case of Significant Silences - UK Constitutional Law Association
0.1 parsecs away

Travel
| | For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16 is a judgment that has triggered great public discussion about the position of trans people in Great Britain (for an interesting discussion of the legal position in Northern Ireland, see Deb et al, "Limits to the UK Supreme Court's Reach: Northern Ireland, the Windsor Framework and...
| | www.legalfeminist.org.uk
A v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire and the transformed landscape of consent -
1.2 parsecs away

Travel
| | The decision in A v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 21, [2005] 1 AC 51 has been the subject of much recent analysis by those involved, and those interested, in the hearing before the Supreme Court in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers. The Scottish Ministers (Respondent) and Amnesty International (intervening) have relied
| | ukconstitutionallaw.org
Shona Wilson Stark: Section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998: Still Standing, or Standing Still? - UK Constitutional Law Association
18.2 parsecs away

Travel
| *Editors' note: this post is part of a series on 'The Human Rights Act After 22 Years', following theSLS Annual Seminarheld in November 2022.You can read the first post in the serieshere.* In previous work, I have criticised the courts' apparent confusion and/or uneasiness with the making of declarations of incompatibility under section 4 of...