/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.bailii.org | ||
| | | | |
ukhumanrightsblog.com
|
|
| | | | | The Weekly Round Up: 'Sex' defined by Supreme Court, Trump administration contempt proceedings, and clinicians' right to privacy | |
| | | | |
www.translegalproject.org
|
|
| | | | | Download this article here:IntroductionThis articlecritically discusses the judgmentin For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16. I have tried where possible for itbe accessible to non-lawyers and to lawyers of all specialisms. The articleis not intended to be comprehensive in its critique of the judgment but focuseson three points:1. The implications of the Court declining to considerunder section 3(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998whether its interpretation would breach t | |
| | | | |
www.legalfeminist.org.uk
|
|
| | | | | The decision in A v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 21, [2005] 1 AC 51 has been the subject of much recent analysis by those involved, and those interested, in the hearing before the Supreme Court in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers. The Scottish Ministers (Respondent) and Amnesty International (intervening) have relied | |
| | | | |
ukconstitutionallaw.org
|
|
| | | On 22 July 2025, the Crown Estate (Wales) Bill passed unopposed through report stage in the House of Lords. The Bill, which seeks to devolve the management of the Crown Estate in Wales, was introduced as a Private Members' Bill in the Lords by the former leader of Plaid Cymru, Lord Wigley. This is by... | ||
