|
You are here |
www.bailii.org | ||
| | | | |
www.translegalproject.org
|
|
| | | | | Download this article here:IntroductionThis articlecritically discusses the judgmentin For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16. I have tried where possible for itbe accessible to non-lawyers and to lawyers of all specialisms. The articleis not intended to be comprehensive in its critique of the judgment but focuseson three points:1. The implications of the Court declining to considerunder section 3(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998whether its interpretation would breach t | |
| | | | |
ukhumanrightsblog.com
|
|
| | | | | The Weekly Round Up: 'Sex' defined by Supreme Court, Trump administration contempt proceedings, and clinicians' right to privacy | |
| | | | |
publiclawforeveryone.com
|
|
| | | | | Earlier this week, the UK Supreme Court gave judgment in relation to the "Scottish Continuity Bill" [2018] UKSC 64. The matter reached the Court through a reference made under section 33(1) of the Scotland Act 1998, according to which the Court has jurisdiction to rule on "the question of whether a [Scottish] Bill or any... | |
| | | | |
jimmeruk.com
|
|
| | | This idiot posted a picture of himself during the election campaign. Ripe for photoshopping. | ||