/explore

Click through on any links that interest you or select the planets on the right to continue exploring the Outer Web.
You are here

 hindenburgresearch.com
Nikola: How to Parlay An Ocean of Lies Into a Partnership With the Largest Auto OEM in America - Hindenburg Research
| | techrights.org
Links 08/03/2023: EndeavourOS Cassini Nova
5.9 parsecs away

Travel
| | [AI summary] The text is a compilation of various topics and discussions, including commentary on internet and technology trends, software development, personal reflections, and specific events such as the 'xz' backdoor issue and the legal dispute between filmmakers and Reddit. It also mentions the use of Gemini as an alternative to the World Wide Web, along with personal and technical musings.
| | www.mediamatters.org
It wasn't just Sidney Powell. Fox repeated the same Dominion lies. | Media Matters for America
6.4 parsecs away

Travel
| | Dominion Voting Systems, a U.S. and Canadian company that supplies election technology throughout North America, has filed a defamation lawsuit against Donald Trump's former attorney Sidney Powell due to the "viral disinformation campaign" she furthered "to financially enrich herself, to raise her public profile, and to ingratiate herself" with Trump in the wake of his reelection loss. Powell's efforts -- which claimed that Dominion had helped rig the election on behalf of President Joe Biden as part of ...
| | nymag.com
Nathan Anderson's Precarious Short-Selling Enterprise
2.5 parsecs away

Travel
| | Nathan Anderson, the proprietor of Hindenburg Research, made his name exposing - and betting against - corporate fraud. But short selling in a frothy pandemic economy can be ruinous. Anderson belongs to a cranky cohort of "activist" short sellers.
| | www.law.cornell.edu
Alexia MORRISON, Independent Counsel, Appellant, v. Theodore B. OLSON, Edward C. Schmults and Carol E. Dinkins. | Supreme Cou...
24.0 parsecs away

Travel
| [AI summary] The text presents a legal analysis of the constitutionality of the independent counsel statute, focusing on the separation of powers and executive authority. The Supreme Court examines whether the statute's provisions, particularly the 'good cause' removal standard and the special court's appointment authority, violate the President's constitutional duty to ensure the faithful execution of the laws. The Court considers precedents such as *Humphrey's Executor* and *Wiener* to determine whether the independent counsel, an inferior officer, is subject to removal restrictions that impede the President's executive power. The analysis concludes that the statute does not unduly interfere with the President's constitutional obligations, as the 'good cau...