Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.law.cornell.edu | ||
| | | | |
www.strata-sphere.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The text presents a collection of opinions and reactions to the Supreme Court's decision on the Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly known as ObamaCare. The discussion revolves around the Court's interpretation of the individual mandate as a tax rather than a penalty, which allows it to be constitutionally upheld under Congress's taxing power. Various viewpoints are expressed, including concerns about the expansion of government power, the potential for future policies that use taxation to influence behavior, and the political implications of the ruling. There are also mentions of conspiracy theories and criticisms of the ruling as a 'dog and pony show.' The text includes references to legal arguments, such as the distinction between penalties an... | |
| | | | |
www.chrisritchie.org
|
|
| | | | | The SCOTUS opinions on Cargill and Rahimi. | |
| | | | |
www.frontporchrepublic.com
|
|
| | | | | Corporate rights was not a spontaneous development but the result of a sort of corporate civil-rights movement. Through litigation (generally well-financed) over two centuries, various corporations won decisions by which corporations evolved from government-created artificial persons, not even mentioned by name in the Constitution, into entities possessed of many of the same constitutional rights as flesh-and-blood human beings. | |
| | | | |
www.buzzfeednews.com
|
|
| | | Was there a mugshot? Could he run for president from prison? We asked legal scholars all your most burning questions. | ||
