|
You are here |
gowers.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
relatedwork.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | | | WARNING: the following contains a whole lot of pedantry about proving theorems at a level of detail such that you could likely convince a co... | |
| | | | |
math.andrej.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] A technical discussion distinguishing between proof by contradiction and proof of negation within the context of classical and intuitionistic logic. | |
| | | | |
existentialtype.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | It is well-known that constructivists renounce "proof by contradiction", and that classicists scoff at the critique. "Those constructivists," the criticismgoes, "want to rule out proofs by contradiction. How absurd! Look, Pythagoras showed that the square root of two is irrational by deriving a contradiction from the assumption that it is rational. There is nothing wrong... | |
| | | | |
www.logicmatters.net
|
|
| | | A standard menu for a first mathematical logic course might be something like this: (1) A treatment of the syntax and semantics of FOL, presenting a proof system or two, leading up to a proof of a Gödel's completeness theorem (and then a glance at e.g. the compactness theorem and some initial implications). (2) An [...] | ||