|
You are here |
unherd.com | ||
| | | | |
pxlnv.com
|
|
| | | | | Since 2022, the European Parliament has been trying to pass legislation requiring digital service providers to scan for and report CSAM as it passes through their services. Giacomo Zandonini, Apostolis Fotiadis, and Lud?k Stavinoha, Balkan Insight, with a good summary in September: Welcomed by some child welfare organisations, the regulation has nevertheless been met with [...] | |
| | | | |
www.patrick-breyer.de
|
|
| | | | | The End of the Privacy of Digital Correspondence The EU wants to oblige providers to search all private chats, messages, and emails automatically for suspicious content - generally and indiscriminately. The stated aim: To prosecute child pornography. The result: Mass surveillance by means of full | |
| | | | |
www.laquadrature.net
|
|
| | | | | This op-ed follows the publication of our article ?Criminalization of encryption: the 8 december case?. It has been signed by more than 130 individuals and organisations. The full list of signatories is available here. It has been published yesterday on the website of the newspaper Le Monde. Encr | |
| | | | |
blog.cyberwar.nl
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The Dutch government's response to the ECJ's April 2014 ruling on the EU Data Retention Directive outlines plans to revise national laws to align with the ruling. Key changes include requiring judicial approval for accessing telecommunications data, differentiating access based on crime severity, encrypting data, and restricting data retention to serious crimes. The government also plans to amend the ANPR data retention bill to require public prosecutor approval for accessing ANPR data. These changes aim to ensure compliance with privacy rights and EU law. | ||