Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
pxlnv.com | ||
| | | | |
excited-pixels.com
|
|
| | | | | Matt Burgess at Wired has a good summary article on the current (and always ongoing) debate concerning the availability of strong encryption. In short, he sees three 'classes' of argument which are aimed at preventing individuals from protecting their communications (and their personal information) with robust encryption. Governments or law enforcement agencies are asking for... | |
| | | | |
www.laquadrature.net
|
|
| | | | | This op-ed follows the publication of our article ?Criminalization of encryption: the 8 december case?. It has been signed by more than 130 individuals and organisations. The full list of signatories is available here. It has been published yesterday on the website of the newspaper Le Monde. Encr | |
| | | | |
berthub.eu
|
|
| | | | | A quick update - The European Commission and EU member states have been pondering, for years now, if they should force WhatsApp/Apple/Signal/Telegram to scan all our private messages for suspected child sexual abuse material (CSAM). For various reasons it is a horrendous idea to break end to end encryption in this likely highly ineffective way. Variations of the proposal have also included a mandate to perform such scanning of images using AI, and even to also read our text messages to see if we aren't "grooming" children. | |
| | | | |
www.thefire.org
|
|
| | | The Supreme Court ruled in 1937 that "the holding of meetings for peaceable political action cannot be proscribed." | ||
