|
You are here |
rclutz.com | ||
| | | | |
anthonyvioli.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Posted on october 13, 2012, by Bob Tisdale This is a deviation from my typical presentation of a subdivided dataset. Usually, I divide the dataset in a way that is intended to illustrate how and why natural variables can explain the warming over the term of that data. In this post, I've broken it into... | |
| | | | |
rclutz.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Reblogged on WordPress.com | |
| | | | |
bobtisdale.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | I'll be adding the Pacific Ocean (60S-65N, 120E-80W) sea surface temperature anomalies to my monthly updates. See Figure 1 for the area covered by those coordinates. Why add the Pacific Ocean? It covers about 45% of the surface area of the global oceans and about 33% of the surface area of the globe (land+oceans combined).... | |
| | | | |
www.climate-skeptic.com
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The text discusses various aspects of climate science, focusing on controversies and criticisms of climate models and temperature data. It highlights issues such as the reliability of surface temperature measurements, the impact of urban heat islands, and the challenges in comparing surface and tropospheric temperature data. The text also questions the validity of climate models by pointing out that they were adjusted to match historical data rather than being purely based on scientific theory. Additionally, it mentions the importance of data transparency and the potential for measurement biases in temperature records. | ||