Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
bobtisdale.blogspot.com | ||
| | | | |
bobtisdale.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | >UPDATE October 22, 2009 On October 15, 2009, the NODC corrected errors in the Ocean Heat Content data for the period of April through June 2009. This post has been updated with that corrected data. ############### The ENSO-induced step changes in the Ocean Heat Content (OHC) of the Tropical Pacific, Tropical Atlantic, South Pacific, South... | |
| | | | |
wattsupwiththat.com
|
|
| | | | | Guest Post by Bob Tisdale UPDATE: Corrected the percentage of ocean heat loss though evaporation. Update 2: Added a link to a post by Willis Eschenbach at the end, and corrected a typo. # # # Ocean heat content and vertically averaged temperature data for the oceans have been the subjects of a couple of... | |
| | | | |
anthonyvioli.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Posted on october 13, 2012, by Bob Tisdale This is a deviation from my typical presentation of a subdivided dataset. Usually, I divide the dataset in a way that is intended to illustrate how and why natural variables can explain the warming over the term of that data. In this post, I've broken it into... | |
| | | | |
www.davidappell.com
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The history of climate change research shows that scientists have long recognized the potential impact of human activities on the climate. From the early 20th century, there were discussions about the greenhouse effect and its influence on global temperatures. Over time, as more data became available, the consensus among scientists grew that increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide, are a significant factor in global warming. Key milestones include the 1958 discovery of the Keeling Curve, which demonstrated the steady rise in atmospheric CO2 levels, and the 1970s and 1980s when the scientific community began to more clearly understand the implications of these changes. By the late 20th century, the evidence supp... | ||
