You are here |
brexitlawni.org | ||
| | | |
ukconstitutionallaw.org
|
|
| | | | In 2025, we celebrate two anniversaries, the 75th anniversary of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the 35th anniversary of the Venice Commission. These significantmilestones will be commemorated by two events over the course of two days, organized bythe Centre for European Law and Internationalisation (CELI, Leicester Law School) and theBingham Centre for... | |
| | | |
iamsteve.in
|
|
| | | | Today I came across an article published on CommonSpace.scot by a guy called Anthony Barrnett, founder ofopendemocracy.net.Entitled 'Why the EU vote is an English, not British, reckoning', it discusses the upcoming EU referendum, and the potential implications, with a particular look at the Scottish element. It seemed like a good read, but before I got... | |
| | | |
source.washu.edu
|
|
| | | | Washington University in St. Louis election law expert Travis Crum said a preliminary injunction blocking two major provisions of a controversial executive order by the Trump administration targeting federal voter registration procedures is a victory for the rule of law. | |
| | | |
www.translegalproject.org
|
|
| | Download this article here:IntroductionThis articlecritically discusses the judgmentin For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16. I have tried where possible for itbe accessible to non-lawyers and to lawyers of all specialisms. The articleis not intended to be comprehensive in its critique of the judgment but focuseson three points:1. The implications of the Court declining to considerunder section 3(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998whether its interpretation would breach t |