/explore
|
You are here 
|
ukconstitutionallaw.org | ||
| | | | |
www.legalfeminist.org.uk
|
|
| | | | | The decision in A v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 21, [2005] 1 AC 51 has been the subject of much recent analysis by those involved, and those interested, in the hearing before the Supreme Court in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers. The Scottish Ministers (Respondent) and Amnesty International (intervening) have relied | |
| | | | |
publiclawforeveryone.com
|
|
| | | | | Earlier this week, I wrote in my review of recent developments that it is possible to identify a stream of jurisprudence that has emerged from the UK Supreme Court over the last year which places particular and renewed emphasis on the common law as a source of fundamental constitutional values and rights. I cited Osborn... | |
| | | | |
www.translegalproject.org
|
|
| | | | | The Badenoch and Truss appointed Equality and Human Rights Commission is decimating the lives of trans people in the United Kingdom. We've thought hard about whether to engage any further with them but decided that we would accept an invitation to one of their 'briefings' and make a submission to the consultation on the new Services Code. In this piece we explore why. Our submission is here:. A few years ago, Gender Critical, anti-trans activists built a highly effective smear campaign attacking | |
| | | | |
reconnect-europe.eu
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The article discusses the UK's approach to modifying retained EU law post-Brexit, focusing on legal uncertainties and Rule of Law concerns arising from different methods of amendment, such as disapplication, delegated powers, and express repeal. | ||
