Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
ukconstitutionallaw.org | ||
| | | | |
www.translegalproject.org
|
|
| | | | | Download this article here:IntroductionThis articlecritically discusses the judgmentin For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16. I have tried where possible for itbe accessible to non-lawyers and to lawyers of all specialisms. The articleis not intended to be comprehensive in its critique of the judgment but focuseson three points:1. The implications of the Court declining to considerunder section 3(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998whether its interpretation would breach t | |
| | | | |
publiclawforeveryone.com
|
|
| | | | | By Mark Elliott and Nicholas Kilford In the Continuity Bill Reference, the Supreme Court advanced a striking analysis of the implications for devolution of the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty - or, more specifically, of the provision in the Scotland Act 1998 that had hitherto been understood merely to affirm that doctrine. The provision in question... | |
| | | | |
reconnect-europe.eu
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The article discusses the UK's approach to modifying retained EU law post-Brexit, focusing on legal uncertainties and Rule of Law concerns arising from different methods of amendment, such as disapplication, delegated powers, and express repeal. | |
| | | | |
transteacher.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | The mainstream media are misreporting the Cass Review interim report - a challenge to some of their claims. | ||
