|
You are here |
syntaxfree.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
hookrace.net
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.jeremykun.com
|
|
| | | | | Perhaps primarily due to the prominence of monads in the Haskell programming language, programmers are often curious about category theory. Proponents of Haskell and other functional languages can put category-theoretic concepts on a pedestal or in a mexican restaurant, and their benefits can seem as mysterious as they are magical. For instance, the most common use of a monad in Haskell is to simulate the mutation of immutable data. Others include suspending and backtracking computations, and even untying tangled rope. | |
| | | | |
bartoszmilewski.com
|
|
| | | | | We have this friendly competition going on between Eric Niebler and myself. He writes some clever C++ template code, and I feel the compulsion to explain it to him in functional terms. Then I write a blog about Haskell or category theory and Eric feels a compulsion to translate it into C++. Eric is now... | |
| | | | |
mjoldfield.com
|
|
| | | |||