Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
argumatronic.com | ||
| | | | |
degoes.net
|
|
| | | | | Functional programming has a bit of jargon, but that doesn't have to stop you from understanding core concepts | |
| | | | |
lambdaland.org
|
|
| | | | | This is the story of how I solved a problem (ugly, cumbersome boilerplate code) that I ran into while writing a program in a functional language (Elixir). Functional programming languages often pride themselves on expressiveness and elegance; but occasionally they are not amenable to the most obvious solutions to the problems we wish to solve. In this case, the simplest solution to my problem would have been to have a global mutable variable. But no one likes those. | |
| | | | |
mmhaskell.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] This article compares Functional Programming and Object Oriented Programming paradigms, discussing their key differences, strengths, weaknesses, and how Haskell fits into the functional paradigm. | |
| | | | |
fsharpforfunandprofit.com
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The article argues that F# is the best enterprise language due to its suitability for enterprise development's constraints and demands, such as long project lifecycles, maintenance, and stability. It highlights the importance of static typing, immutability, and functional programming principles in enhancing productivity and maintainability. The author also discusses the challenges of adopting new technologies in enterprises and evaluates various languages like Java, C#, Kotlin, and TypeScript, ultimately favoring F# for its comprehensive support and functional-first approach. | ||
