|
You are here |
argumatronic.com | ||
| | | | |
degoes.net
|
|
| | | | | Functional programming has a bit of jargon, but that doesn't have to stop you from understanding core concepts | |
| | | | |
mmhaskell.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] This article compares Functional Programming and Object Oriented Programming paradigms, discussing their key differences, strengths, weaknesses, and how Haskell fits into the functional paradigm. | |
| | | | |
lambdaland.org
|
|
| | | | | This is the story of how I solved a problem (ugly, cumbersome boilerplate code) that I ran into while writing a program in a functional language (Elixir). Functional programming languages often pride themselves on expressiveness and elegance; but occasionally they are not amenable to the most obvious solutions to the problems we wish to solve. In this case, the simplest solution to my problem would have been to have a global mutable variable. But no one likes those. | |
| | | | |
www.sevangelatos.com
|
|
| | | So, this is an mirror of a post from John Carmack. Recently I learned that his articles on #AltDevBlog are no longer acessible. So, in order to archive them, I am re-posting them here. These articles are definitely good reads and worth to be preserved. Probably everyone reading this has | ||