/explore
|
You are here 
|
argumatronic.com | ||
| | | | |
mmhaskell.com
[AI summary] This article compares Functional Programming and Object Oriented Programming paradigms, discussing their key differences, strengths, weaknesses, and how Haskell fits into the functional paradigm. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
degoes.net
Functional programming has a bit of jargon, but that doesn't have to stop you from understanding core concepts |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
lambdaland.org
This is the story of how I solved a problem (ugly, cumbersome boilerplate code) that I ran into while writing a program in a functional language (Elixir). Functional programming languages often pride themselves on expressiveness and elegance; but occasionally they are not amenable to the most obvious solutions to the problems we wish to solve. In this case, the simplest solution to my problem would have been to have a global mutable variable. But no one likes those. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
bartoszmilewski.com
This is part 15 of Categories for Programmers. Previously: Representable Functors. See the Table of Contents. Most constructions in category theory are generalizations of results from other more specific areas of mathematics. Things like products, coproducts, monoids, exponentials, etc., have been known long before category theory. They might have been known under different names in... |
|
| | | |||
