|
You are here |
boostorg.github.io | ||
| | | | |
kuruczgy.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The article explores the intersection of functional programming and logic through the lens of dependent types. It begins with foundational concepts like type constructors and inductive types, then delves into the Curry-Howard isomorphism, which links programs to mathematical proofs. The discussion covers how types represent propositions, functions as implications, and inductive types as proof strategies. Examples include defining logical relations like less than or equal to and equality, and demonstrating how to prove properties like universal quantification and mathematical identities. The article concludes with an overview of resources for further study in proof assistants like Coq and Idris, emphasizing the practical applications of dependent... | |
| | | | |
ericniebler.com
|
|
| | | | | As you may have heard by now, Ranges got merged and will be part of C++20. This is huge news and represents probably the biggest shift the Standard Library has seen since it was first standardized ... | |
| | | | |
www.cppstories.com
|
|
| | | | | When you see an article about new C++ features, most of the time you'll have a description of major elements. Looking at C++17, there are a lot of posts (including articles from this blog) about structured bindings, filesystem, parallel algorithms, if constexpr, std::optional, std::variant... and other prominent C++17 additions. But how about some smaller parts? | |
| | | | |
gcher.com
|
|
| | | Recently I got interested in the new Apple language Swift, that will probably replace objective-c as the language of choice for native iOS and OSX applications. There are many things I like in Swift, and also other things I don't like. But one thing that I really enjoy is the support for lambdas, specially compared to the way it works in C++. Why do I think the lambdas in swift are better? | ||