|
You are here |
ericniebler.com | ||
| | | | |
www.reedbeta.com
|
|
| | | | | Pixels and polygons and shaders, oh my! | |
| | | | |
brevzin.github.io
|
|
| | | | | Let's say we had a range, represented by a pair of pointers, that we wanted to copy into another pointer. We might write that like so: | |
| | | | |
www.artima.com
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
existentialtype.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | While reviewing some of the comments on my post about parallelism and concurrency, I noticed that the great fallacy about dynamic and static languages continues to hold people in its thrall. So, in the same "everything you know is wrong" spirit, let me try to set this straight: a dynamic language is a straightjacketed static | ||